a.k.a. "The Oscar Messenger"

Posts tagged ‘Dame Heleln Mirren’

Oscar Poker & the Mystery of Snuggles 4

On this week’s Oscar Poker podcast, which you can reach if you go on  over to www.hollywood-elsewhere.com ,host Jeff Wells welcomes www.goldderby.com & Tom O’Neil, the most indefatigable  Oscarologist of us all. And Tom is just raring to give us even MORE dish on the mysterious Gold Derby subscriber, who also predicts, and predicts BETTER than anyone, even though he is not a journalist. If you click on Snuggles4’s name at Gold Derby you will see just what he has said and when and where. But there’s a couple of caveats.

Tom O. created Internet headlines yesterday by saying that Snuggles 4(who named himself after the Fabric softener…lol) was predicting on OCT.6(!) that “Les Miserables” was going to have a “monster sweep” of the Oscars and win Best Picture. But if you go see just exactly WHAT Snuggles4 IS predicting,  you first have to sign up with your email account or your Facebook account, and THEN and only then can you see EXACTLY what Snuggles4 said.

And Tom O. reveals more in the podcast.

Upon prodding from Jeff Wells, Tom says that he does think that Snuggles HAS seen “Les Miz” and was utterly blown away by it. Tom demurs about this in his actual Goldderby articlepost, but Jeff got him to go on. He says Snuggles describes himself as “an industry gadfly” and “an industry insider,” and he’s afraid to claim his Gold Derby prize from last year, because he doesn’t want to “come out” which of course, according to my gay mind, is code for Snuggles being gay,too.

And he doesn’t want to reveal more because of “the people he’s associated with,” not who he WORKS for, means he’s an agent of some kind.

A gay agent? In Hollywood? Well, that narrows it down to just about the entire industry.

And no straight man would be THIS obsessed with the Oscars, the gay Olympics. Nor would a straight man call himself Snuggles.
Why should we care? Why should we pay attention? Because according to Tom O. , he’s been more accurate than ANY one. He also was predicting the Emmys!  And so…what did Snuggles actually predict, if we are to believe him more than anybody? Even Tom. Even Jeff.

Snuggles ACTUALLY predicts only FOUR wins that I could count for “Les Miz” Best Picture, Best Supporting Actress(Anne Hathaway), Best Director Tom Hooper(AGAIN!?!) and Best Production Design.

That’s only FOUR Oscars! That’s not a “monster sweep”! To be fair, what Tom was referring to was a “monstrous sweep” of the nominations. And yes, there were so many categories “Les Miz” was figuring in, according to Snuggles,  couldn’t quickly count them all, and THAT’S the sweep. He’s not predicting it will win in all those categories!

For instance, he has Hugh Jackman as his number five for Best Actor, but Snuggles has him losing to John Hawkes for “The Sessions” as Best Actor! He’s got Daniel Day-Lewis and Joaquim Phoenix in there, followed by Sir Anthony Hopkins for “Hitchcock.” I could totally see Hawkes winning, too, since you brought it up. Or rather Snuggles did.

Snuggles also has no mention of Dame Helen Mirren as Best Actress, but has Helen Hunt in the lead category, and not switching her to Supporting…And no Marion Cotillard. But Emmanuelle Riva of “Amour” is in. And she’s popping up everywhere and knocking Mademoiselle Marion out on many boards.

He’s got Jennifer Lawrence on top as does EVERYBODY ELSE IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD. Except Scott Feinberg, who demurred and thought that Qu’venzhane Wallis would get it for “Beasts of the Southern Wild”(!) “if the Academy picks up on her story.”

Meanwhile, Tom O. told Jeff that he thought the fact that SAG disqualified Q. Wallis and Dwight Henry from “Beasts of the Southern Wild” (they’re not members)might actually hurt their being nominated AT ALL by the Academy. SAG(The Screen Actors Guild) and AMPAS are two entirely different beasts, and not of the Southern Wild, thank you very much.

Vis a vis little Miss Q. ,Tom said that the snobby, clannish Academy’s Acting Branch Members, who would have to nominate her might think “Well, she’s not one of us.” Plus she’ll only be nine years old come February.

The plot sickens.

Alma Hitchcock in “Hitchcock” as Played by Dame Helen Mirren, she’s the “woman behind the man” no more!

One of the main reasons, it is rumored that Fox Searchlight changed up the Oscar race, at this late date in the awards season’s already cast-in-iron schedule (with the announcement of their opening “Hitchcock” on Thanksgiving Day), is Dame Helen Mirren’s leading role portrayal of Mrs. Hitchcock. Or more correctly Lady Hitchcock.

Alma Reville Hitchcock will be the “little woman behind the man” no more. And when Academy Award Winner Dame Helen meets a role that could please Mr. Oscar ~ LOOK OUT!  AWARDS FIREWORKS AHEAD!

Portraying her husband of some 40 years, is no less than another Academy Award Winner, Sir Anthony Hopkins. He, who did so well, with Hannibal Lecter. He had the briefest Best Actor screen time in all of Hwood history! Yes, he did!  And he’s sure to make a meal of the delectably juicy Sir Alfred’s plumminess.

AND there’s the added bonus of the never-before-nominated Scarlett Johanson portraying Academy-Award Nominee Janet Leigh. She was the  naked-girl-in-the-shower-scene, perhaps the most famous scene Hitchcock ever shot.

The film was purported to detail the behind-the-scenes story of “Psycho,” but it seems now from rumors out of La-La Land, it is the marriage of Alfred & Alma that is taking center stage in the story instead.

And it’s  a great Hollywood love story that never has been told.

One way to catch up on it quick, if you can’t wait til November, and who can? Is to read their daughter Patricia’s recent biography of her mother “Alma Hitchock -The Woman Behind the Man.” It’s a delightful read and really fills in rather completely just who Alma Reville was.

A tiny British beauty, she was involved with movies even before her husband was. She was a film editor. And before that briefly an actress. And she and Hitch met when they were both making silent films. He was designing sets and writing the inter-titles for the Silents. It’s so interesting to me that both their careers spanned the entire history of movies!

Alma Reville wrote many of the scripts for her husband’s movies, though she did not always get screen credit for them. For instance on “The Lady Vanishes” she gets top billing, but it says “Continuity by Alma Reville.”

And her expert editing eye was involved in almost every artistic decision the Master made. This according to the man himself. Her roles in his life and work were many and varied, and she was a good cook, too! Her recipes are included in the back of Patricia Hitchcock’s loving memoir.

Every script would be run by Alma first, and if she thought it would make a good movie, Hitch then acted upon it. If Alma said “no!” it was a dead project. And Alma did much, much more of the writing and re-writing on many of his films that she was never credited with. Pat Hitchcock’s book, and now “Hitchcock” the movie seem intent on redressing this imbalance.

The Master of Suspense was not joking when he said, “The only critic I fear is my wife.”

Their dutiful daughter Pat was also an actress herself and her most memorable role was of the mystery-obsessed younger sister to Ruth Roman in one of Hitchcock’s many masterpieces “Strangers on a Train”

She’s quite petite and probably is more a mirror of her mother’s pleasant-minded-ness and orderliness, than her father’s famed dark side. Pat Hitchcock appears on the special features on nearly every DVD of her father’s work.

Alfred Hitchock always gave Alma all the credit for everything he did, if he was asked.

“I’m nothing without your mother,” he would say over and over again to his daughter, and any journalist who would listen, and I bet Fox Searchlight’s rushing “Hitchcock” into an awards season release is going to show us just HOW much Alma meant to him. And to his work, that everyone loves so much. And the eternal debt filmdom owes to her for everything that she did do behind the scenes.

Pat Hitchcock says, “Nobody ever gave my mother credit for anything. And she didn’t take the credit herself.” Though, as I said, her husband certainly did when asked.

I can’t wait for this movie! And I bet Patricia Hitchock herself is probably DEEE-lighted by this turn of events where at long last her mother is going to go “toe-to-toe” as Oscar Blogger Extraordinaire Scott Feinberg says in “The Hollywood Reporter.”

It will be a “Good Evening” at the movies indeed!

And then there’s “The Girl” ANOTHER movie on Sir Alfred, this time about “The Birds” and his tormented relationship with its’ star Tippi Hedren. That will be on HBO very soon, and tells, evidently ANOTHER story completely. There’s a book by Donald Spoto out on this topic, which this film is based on, and it’s hair-raising. And I believe, true.

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: